Abstract

This paper challenges the argument that data protection legislation may harm research by unduly restricting the flow of personal health information. I unpack the assumption that privacy is an individual right that must give way to research as a social good, and explore how data protection laws facilitate the flow of information for research purposes. I conclude that researchers should embrace data protection laws because they help construct trust in research practices, mitigate the commercial imperatives that flow from the fact that research is a public-private enterprise and protect the accuracy of data. Good research design should recognize that privacy is a social value and an essential element of psychological health and social relationships. And since research databases do not exist in isolation, researchers must respect the fact that the non-consensual flow of information poses risks of harm, including the secondary use of health research databases for social control, that must be managed.

[To view the French abstract, please scroll down.]

 

This article is for subscribers only.
To view the entire article, sign in if you are a subscriber. Or select one of the options below.

 

Personal Subscriber? Sign In


     Remember Me

     

    Please note: To register for an event you must sign-in as an individual or create a personal Longwood's account. Thank you.

     

    Purchase this article.


    Instant access to the full text and PDF of this article.

    Price: $15.50

     

    Comments

    Be the first to comment on this!

    You must sign in to comment Sign In or Create an Account to add comments